The first business case in "An AI Friendly Approach To I-Ching" is about Isamu Akasaki's journey to co-winning the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2014 for inventing efficient blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs). It is a tale of persistence, innovation, and triumph over adversity.
The following are the discussion/challenge of Isamu Akasaki case with ChatGPT GPTs, which require user subscription to GPT4.0
https://chat.openai.com/g/g-b92TCYEdA-an-ai-friendly-approach-to-i-ching-service-bot
A similar version had been setup at poe, which are open to public for free usage. But I that could be less intelligent due to resources limitation of free service.
https://poe.com/AI_Friendly_I-Ching
Ask:
Why Isamu Akasaki case is Haven over Haven. He was doing research in a difficult situation, it seems to be Haven over Water as well?
AI:
Isamu Akasaki's case, based on your description, could indeed resonate with two hexagrams: "Haven over Haven" (Hexagram 1) for his perseverance and strength during challenging times, and "Haven over Water" (Hexagram 41) for experiencing adversity in his research endeavors. Both hexagrams can provide useful insights into his situation, reflecting different aspects of his experience.
Hexagram 1: Haven over Haven (Momentum)
This hexagram symbolizes strength and perseverance in adversity, which fits Akasaki's dedication to his research despite the difficult circumstances. The key insights from "An AI Friendly Approach To I-Ching" for this hexagram emphasize the need for talent-rich companies (or individuals, in this case) to persevere and continuously strive for improvement, even when immediate returns or outcomes seem low. This aligns well with Akasaki's long-term commitment to developing blue LEDs despite numerous challenges.
Hexagram 41: Haven over Water (Dissension)
This hexagram depicts dealing with conflict and adversity, particularly in a challenging environment that tests resilience and adaptability. For Akasaki, this could symbolize the skepticism he faced from the scientific community and the struggles inherent in pioneering work with limited support. The hexagram advises maintaining integrity and a strategic approach during such times, focusing on core strengths and adapting to overcome obstacles.
Both hexagrams provide a framework for understanding and appreciating Akasaki's journey in the context of the I-Ching. While "Haven over Haven" reflects his internal strength and persistent drive, "Haven over Water" highlights the external challenges and his response to them. These insights demonstrate how different aspects of the I-Ching can be applied to understand and learn from his exemplary dedication and innovation in the face of adversity.
Ask:
AI:
Analyzing Isamu Akasaki's case using the hexagram "Haven over Water" (Hexagram 41, Dissension) from the perspective of the "An AI Friendly Approach To I-Ching," we focus on the specific challenges and adversities he faced in his groundbreaking research on blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs). This hexagram combines the upper trigram of Haven (Qian乾), representing strength and authority, with the lower trigram of Water (Kan坎), which symbolizes danger, obstacles, and the unknown.
Hexagram 41: Haven over Water (Dissension)
External Environment (Haven - Qian乾):
- Searching for the Bottom in Recession: Reflects the tough economic or institutional environments, possibly indicating a lack of funding and support for research, especially in a field that was not yet recognized or valued. This aligns with the period during which Akasaki was conducting his research, where resources were scarce, and blue LEDs were not seen as feasible or promising by many in the scientific community.
Internal Nature (Water - Kan坎):
- Adaptability: The trigram Water symbolizes adaptability and resilience. For Akasaki, this suggests his ability to navigate through the inherent difficulties of pioneering new technology. His adaptability is shown in his persistence to continue with his research despite the skepticism and limited resources.
Analysis of the Hexagram:
Facing Adversity with Strength: The combination of Haven and Water suggests a scenario where a strong foundation (Haven) confronts profound challenges (Water). Akasaki's firm belief in the potential of blue LEDs, backed by his expertise and perseverance, allowed him to confront and navigate through the skepticism and resource constraints effectively.
Strategic Adaptation: Despite the external pressures and the risky nature of his research, Akasaki adapted his strategies to continue his work. This included securing funding through various means and pushing the boundaries of existing semiconductor technology.
Resilience in Innovation: This hexagram advises harnessing internal strengths to deal with external challenges. Akasaki's innovative approach and his refusal to give up in the face of adversity are reflective of the qualities encouraged by this hexagram—utilizing one's inner resources (talent and resilience) to overcome external obstacles (skepticism and lack of support).
Emerging Stronger: Just as Water eventually finds its way through or around obstacles, Akasaki's work eventually led to significant breakthroughs that not only proved the skeptics wrong but also transformed lighting technology, demonstrating how persistence in adversity can lead to transformative outcomes.
In summary, using the hexagram "Haven over Water" to analyze Isamu Akasaki's case emphasizes the dynamic interplay between his strong internal drive and the external adversities he faced. It highlights the importance of resilience, strategic adaptation, and the effective use of one's intrinsic strengths to overcome challenges and achieve groundbreaking success. This analysis underscores the teachings of the I-Ching about navigating change and difficulty with wisdom and determination.
Ask:
AI:
The absence of a direct mention of "dissension" in my initial analysis doesn't mean the I-Ching interpretation is incorrect, but rather that the focus was more on the broader themes of resilience and strategic adaptation against adversity. However, I understand your point and appreciate the need to address the "dissension" aspect more explicitly, as it is central to the meaning of the "Haven over Water" hexagram.
Revisiting Hexagram 41: Haven over Water (Dissension)
Dissension Element:
- Conflict and Challenge: In the context of Isamu Akasaki’s research, the "dissension" element can be interpreted as the conflicts and challenges he faced within the scientific community and possibly funding institutions. His innovative ideas on blue LEDs were initially met with skepticism and doubt, which created a form of dissension or conflict between his vision and the prevailing scientific opinions of the time.
- Navigating through Opposition: The dissension aspect also highlights how Akasaki had to navigate through these opposing views. His situation required not only technical adaptability but also the ability to manage and respond to the doubts and criticisms from peers and potential backers.
Incorporating Dissension into the Analysis:
Facing Skepticism: Akasaki's work on blue LEDs was pioneering and not initially well-received. This skepticism from the scientific community represents the dissension aspect, as he was pushing against established norms and expectations.
Persistence in Controversy: The ability to continue pursuing his research, advocating for its potential despite opposition, and eventually overcoming the significant scientific hurdles mirrors the struggle suggested by the "dissension" in the hexagram. This shows his engagement with and overcoming of the direct conflicts posed by his environment.
Transformation of Belief: The ultimate success of Akasaki’s work transformed industry skepticism into widespread acceptance and support, illustrating how confronting and resolving dissension can lead to profound changes and progress.
Cultural and Institutional Challenges: Beyond technical challenges, Akasaki also faced cultural and institutional barriers, which required him to continuously justify his work and seek support in an environment that may not have been ready to embrace such innovation.
Conclusion: In the revised analysis, incorporating the dissension element emphasizes how Akasaki's journey was not just about overcoming technical challenges but also about dealing with and transforming the conflicts and skepticism he encountered. The I-Ching, through the lens of "Haven over Water," provides a framework for understanding how internal strength and resilience can be used to navigate external conflicts and challenges, leading to eventual success and transformation.
This interpretation aligns more closely with the traditional essence of dealing with adversities as described by the hexagram, illustrating how the I-Ching can provide insights into personal and professional challenges.
Ask:
AI:
The detail of Isamu Akasaki being involved in a lawsuit with his company indeed adds a significant element to the "dissension" aspect of the "Haven over Water" hexagram. This scenario provides a clearer instance of conflict and opposition, which is central to the meaning of the hexagram.
Deepening the Analysis with the Lawsuit Context
Dissension Revisited:
- Legal Conflict: The lawsuit between Akasaki and his company is a literal form of dissension, representing legal and possibly ethical conflicts within a professional and financial context. This type of conflict aligns well with the "Water" trigram, which signifies obstacles and peril, requiring careful navigation and wisdom.
Impact of the Lawsuit:
- Professional and Personal Strife: The lawsuit likely caused significant professional and personal strife for Akasaki, challenging his resilience and adaptability—key traits encouraged by the "Water" trigram in managing difficult situations.
- Public and Institutional Perception: Legal disputes can also affect how an individual's work is perceived by the public and within institutional frameworks, potentially leading to reputational risks and the need for strategic communication and positioning.
- Resolution and Learning: How Akasaki handled the lawsuit—his strategies for resolution and the lessons learned—could provide insights into his character and the applicative wisdom of the "Haven" trigram, which emphasizes using inner strength and authority to manage and transcend external challenges.
Broader Implications:
- Reflection on Ethics and Innovation: The lawsuit might reflect broader ethical and operational challenges often encountered by innovators and pioneers in technology, where the implications of new discoveries can lead to conflicts over rights, profits, and recognition.
- Guidance from I-Ching: This scenario underlines the I-Ching’s guidance on navigating through periods of conflict with integrity and strategic acumen. It suggests the importance of maintaining one's principles and values even when faced with challenging and potentially divisive situations.
Conclusion: Incorporating the lawsuit into the analysis of Akasaki's case through the lens of "Haven over Water" enriches our understanding of the kinds of dissension he faced. It not only involved scientific skepticism but extended to legal and ethical realms, highlighting the multifaceted nature of challenges that can arise in innovative fields. The I-Ching offers a philosophical framework to explore how internal virtues and strengths can guide one through such external trials, emphasizing resilience, integrity, and strategic foresight as essential qualities for overcoming adversity and achieving lasting impact.
"An AI Friendly Approach To I-Ching", by Soliton Schooler
《第四易經》 孤獨的國學渣
没有评论:
发表评论